
Unfortunately, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
In my case, opinion is carefully tempered by meticulous research—not, I regret to say, experimentation or immersion, which would require sustained contact, but the careful gathering of remote observations, which, combined, render a glimpse or an insight into a highly specialized and locally adapted culture…
We know a good many facts about them, but these are the superficial trappings of a niche lifestyle—ephemera—according to the University. They won't fund any more projects on the subject. I have written hundreds of grant proposals. I now have to admit my work is subject to changes in fashion.
So—trivia—fine—I study trivial facts—like the dogs, or the use of dogs to portray a bourgeois invisibility. No one asks, but I think it begs the question: Why, and, why now?
These habits are an outward sign, a starting point, but they can't tell us the whole story. And the general public has a desire—the University calls it prurient—to know more. All the book sites—successful, reputable—are crammed with guides, manuals, and memoirs. I call this a market; the University calls it a flooded market.
An academic's whole life dwindles when his field of expertise is discarded from the curriculum. But I go on updating my catalog, out of habit, out of stubbornness. I don't expect to teach again, but I think my endeavors are worth noting, and documenting. To that end I need a space devoted to my archives, which, for the past eleven months, have occupied the basement of my home. Conditions are not ideal. For one thing, the electricity is sporadic. I intend to take a look at the wiring, but every glance into the clotted ruins of the basement sends me to the medicine cabinet, wheezing. I am allergic to mold…
No comments:
Post a Comment